<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1133 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171940</link>
    <description>The court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, ruling the termination of Respondent No.1&#039;s dealership as arbitrary, illegal, and against natural justice principles due to improper notice and procedural lapses. The Special Leave Petition was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of adhering to procedural guidelines and ensuring fairness in dealership agreement terminations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2015 08:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1133 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171940</link>
      <description>The court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, ruling the termination of Respondent No.1&#039;s dealership as arbitrary, illegal, and against natural justice principles due to improper notice and procedural lapses. The Special Leave Petition was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of adhering to procedural guidelines and ensuring fairness in dealership agreement terminations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>