<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 401 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262484</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Order-in-Appeal confirming a demand under the reverse charge mechanism for imported taxable service during 2002-03. The Tribunal held that the reverse charge mechanism was not applicable pre-18.04.2006, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment in Indian National Shipowners Assn case. As the period in question was before the effective date of the mechanism, the appeal was not sustainable and was therefore dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2015 10:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 401 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262484</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Order-in-Appeal confirming a demand under the reverse charge mechanism for imported taxable service during 2002-03. The Tribunal held that the reverse charge mechanism was not applicable pre-18.04.2006, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment in Indian National Shipowners Assn case. As the period in question was before the effective date of the mechanism, the appeal was not sustainable and was therefore dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>