<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 398 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262481</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed to the extent that the appellant was not required to pay service tax on the majority of the demand confirmed by the order, except for specific tax components of Rs. 23,562/- and Rs. 34,437/-. The decision highlighted the impact of Notification No.45/2010-ST on the liability of the appellant and clarified the scope of the exemption provided under the relevant regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2015 10:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 398 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262481</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed to the extent that the appellant was not required to pay service tax on the majority of the demand confirmed by the order, except for specific tax components of Rs. 23,562/- and Rs. 34,437/-. The decision highlighted the impact of Notification No.45/2010-ST on the liability of the appellant and clarified the scope of the exemption provided under the relevant regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>