<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 395 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262478</link>
    <description>Furnishing the required bank guarantee under the statutory scheme removed the basis for continued detention of the vehicles and goods; once supporting documents and part payment through banking channels were shown, further retention was unjustified. The Court directed immediate release of the goods and vehicles and awarded costs for the unwarranted continuation of detention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 07:43:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 395 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262478</link>
      <description>Furnishing the required bank guarantee under the statutory scheme removed the basis for continued detention of the vehicles and goods; once supporting documents and part payment through banking channels were shown, further retention was unjustified. The Court directed immediate release of the goods and vehicles and awarded costs for the unwarranted continuation of detention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>