https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262476 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the decision in favor of the Respondent. It was found that the Respondent had taken CENVAT Credit based on valid ISD invoices issued by their Head Office, meeting the requirements under Rule 9 of CCR and Rule 4A of the Service Tax Rules. The Tribunal determined that the ISD invoices contained all necessary particulars, qualifying them as valid documents for credit. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was rejected, affirming the decision of the First Appellate Authority in favor of the Respondent. en-us Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262476 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the decision in favor of the Respondent. It was found that the Respondent had taken CENVAT Credit based on valid ISD invoices issued by their Head Office, meeting the requirements under Rule 9 of CCR and Rule 4A of the Service Tax Rules. The Tribunal determined that the ISD invoices contained all necessary particulars, qualifying them as valid documents for credit. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was rejected, affirming the decision of the First Appellate Authority in favor of the Respondent. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262476