<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 392 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262475</link>
    <description>Where sale and transportation are covered by separate contracts and goods are delivered to the carrier for transmission to the buyer, freight and related transit charges from the place of removal to the place of delivery are not includible in the assessable value under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal applied the settled principle that delivery to a carrier in pursuance of a contract of sale is prima facie delivery to the buyer, and treated post-removal transportation charges under the separate arrangement as outside excise valuation. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed and the assessee&#039;s valuation position was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 07:43:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 392 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262475</link>
      <description>Where sale and transportation are covered by separate contracts and goods are delivered to the carrier for transmission to the buyer, freight and related transit charges from the place of removal to the place of delivery are not includible in the assessable value under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal applied the settled principle that delivery to a carrier in pursuance of a contract of sale is prima facie delivery to the buyer, and treated post-removal transportation charges under the separate arrangement as outside excise valuation. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed and the assessee&#039;s valuation position was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>