<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 383 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262466</link>
    <description>An imported insecticide classified under CTH 3808 was treated as falling within Sl. No. 83 of Notification No. 72/2005-Customs, so exemption eligibility depended on acceptance of that tariff classification. The Department accepted that the benefit would follow if the Indian tariff classification of the import was upheld, and the applicant did not pursue the other issue. On that classification basis, the product was held eligible for the exemption under the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 383 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262466</link>
      <description>An imported insecticide classified under CTH 3808 was treated as falling within Sl. No. 83 of Notification No. 72/2005-Customs, so exemption eligibility depended on acceptance of that tariff classification. The Department accepted that the benefit would follow if the Indian tariff classification of the import was upheld, and the applicant did not pursue the other issue. On that classification basis, the product was held eligible for the exemption under the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>