<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 381 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262464</link>
    <description>The majority view upheld SEBI&#039;s decision that the appellant was not a fit and proper person to hold shares in certain stock exchanges based on the FMC order, emphasizing the interconnected nature of financial markets. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, while the minority view favored allowing it due to procedural lapses and insufficient demonstration of the FMC order&#039;s impact on the securities market. The Tribunal granted the appellant an extension of four weeks to disinvest their shares.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 07:42:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 381 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262464</link>
      <description>The majority view upheld SEBI&#039;s decision that the appellant was not a fit and proper person to hold shares in certain stock exchanges based on the FMC order, emphasizing the interconnected nature of financial markets. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, while the minority view favored allowing it due to procedural lapses and insufficient demonstration of the FMC order&#039;s impact on the securities market. The Tribunal granted the appellant an extension of four weeks to disinvest their shares.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>