<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 374 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262457</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the set-off of unabsorbed depreciation and business loss. It was clarified that unabsorbed depreciation could be carried forward indefinitely and set off against profits without any time limit. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s interpretation that the business loss set-off was valid within the prescribed time frame, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2017 13:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 374 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262457</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the set-off of unabsorbed depreciation and business loss. It was clarified that unabsorbed depreciation could be carried forward indefinitely and set off against profits without any time limit. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s interpretation that the business loss set-off was valid within the prescribed time frame, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>