<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 372 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262455</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals, emphasizing consistency in tax assessments. It held that the &#039;keyman insurance policy&#039; claimed as a business expenditure qualified as such, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument based on IRDA circulars. Additionally, the Court upheld the Assessee&#039;s treatment of Rs. 50 lakhs as capital gains for AY 2007-08, denying the Revenue&#039;s later contention that it should be considered business income. The Court found no substantial question of law and dismissed the appeals, maintaining the initial assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 07:41:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 372 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262455</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals, emphasizing consistency in tax assessments. It held that the &#039;keyman insurance policy&#039; claimed as a business expenditure qualified as such, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument based on IRDA circulars. Additionally, the Court upheld the Assessee&#039;s treatment of Rs. 50 lakhs as capital gains for AY 2007-08, denying the Revenue&#039;s later contention that it should be considered business income. The Court found no substantial question of law and dismissed the appeals, maintaining the initial assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>