<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 367 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262450</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The society&#039;s claim for exemption under Section 11 was allowed as capitation fees were collected by an individual without the society&#039;s involvement. The additions of Rs. 7,76,50,000 and Rs. 10 lakhs as undisclosed income and unaccounted expenditure were deleted, as these amounts were found to be associated with the individual and not the society.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 07:41:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 367 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262450</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The society&#039;s claim for exemption under Section 11 was allowed as capitation fees were collected by an individual without the society&#039;s involvement. The additions of Rs. 7,76,50,000 and Rs. 10 lakhs as undisclosed income and unaccounted expenditure were deleted, as these amounts were found to be associated with the individual and not the society.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>