<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 364 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262447</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the Rs. 3,06,91,356/- addition of undisclosed income. It emphasized the need for corroborative evidence, the improbability of the net profit figure, and the requirement to base assessments on real income. The Tribunal stressed providing a fair opportunity for the assessee to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 07:41:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 364 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262447</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the Rs. 3,06,91,356/- addition of undisclosed income. It emphasized the need for corroborative evidence, the improbability of the net profit figure, and the requirement to base assessments on real income. The Tribunal stressed providing a fair opportunity for the assessee to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>