<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 358 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262441</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the restriction of local area expenses to 50%, dismissed the appeal on business promotion expenses due to lack of evidence, and upheld the deletion of disallowance on research and development expenses. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the first appellate authority&#039;s findings and partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for one assessment year while dismissing it for another.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 07:40:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 358 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262441</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the restriction of local area expenses to 50%, dismissed the appeal on business promotion expenses due to lack of evidence, and upheld the deletion of disallowance on research and development expenses. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the first appellate authority&#039;s findings and partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for one assessment year while dismissing it for another.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>