<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 356 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262439</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue authorities&#039; additions regarding unexplained cash deposits in the bank account, as the Assessee failed to provide substantial evidence for the source of deposits and the revised sale consideration. The Tribunal found the Assessee&#039;s reliance on case laws for defense inapplicable, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 07:40:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 356 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262439</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue authorities&#039; additions regarding unexplained cash deposits in the bank account, as the Assessee failed to provide substantial evidence for the source of deposits and the revised sale consideration. The Tribunal found the Assessee&#039;s reliance on case laws for defense inapplicable, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>