<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 800 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171931</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court treated the questions on whether Ammonium Sulphate emerging during manufacture of MNI was a by-product or final product, and whether Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 applied to exempted or nil-rated products, as academic because both issues had already been decided against the revenue in an earlier judgment. No fresh merits adjudication was undertaken in this proceeding. The application was therefore disposed of as academic, the rule was discharged, and no order as to costs was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:52:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 800 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171931</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court treated the questions on whether Ammonium Sulphate emerging during manufacture of MNI was a by-product or final product, and whether Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 applied to exempted or nil-rated products, as academic because both issues had already been decided against the revenue in an earlier judgment. No fresh merits adjudication was undertaken in this proceeding. The application was therefore disposed of as academic, the rule was discharged, and no order as to costs was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>