<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 927 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171919</link>
    <description>The SLP was dismissed for non-prosecution when counsel failed to appear on the second call, and the Court also stated that no merit was found on the merits. The order therefore terminated the proceedings both for default and after a brief merits review. Delay was condoned, but that did not alter the dismissal of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 927 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171919</link>
      <description>The SLP was dismissed for non-prosecution when counsel failed to appear on the second call, and the Court also stated that no merit was found on the merits. The order therefore terminated the proceedings both for default and after a brief merits review. Delay was condoned, but that did not alter the dismissal of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>