<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 639 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171917</link>
    <description>Second appellate jurisdiction is confined to genuine substantial questions of law, and concurrent findings of fact cannot be disturbed unless perverse or based on misreading of evidence; the High Court therefore should not reappreciate evidence on an assumption contrary to those findings. An objection to admissibility must be taken when a document is tendered, and a later challenge limited to mode of proof is waived if no timely objection is raised. Regular account books with supporting oral evidence may be relied on, municipal entries do not by themselves prove title, and a tenant cannot validly attorn to a third party during the subsistence of the original tenancy. The appellant&#039;s entitlement to possession and rent was thus upheld in the discussion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 16:37:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 639 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171917</link>
      <description>Second appellate jurisdiction is confined to genuine substantial questions of law, and concurrent findings of fact cannot be disturbed unless perverse or based on misreading of evidence; the High Court therefore should not reappreciate evidence on an assumption contrary to those findings. An objection to admissibility must be taken when a document is tendered, and a later challenge limited to mode of proof is waived if no timely objection is raised. Regular account books with supporting oral evidence may be relied on, municipal entries do not by themselves prove title, and a tenant cannot validly attorn to a third party during the subsistence of the original tenancy. The appellant&#039;s entitlement to possession and rent was thus upheld in the discussion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>