<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 354 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262437</link>
    <description>The court upheld the demand for customs duty, interest, and penalties amounting to Rs. 27,77,16,984 under the Customs Act, 1962, against the appellant for illegally importing goods under the guise of bonafide gifts. The appellant&#039;s failure to comply with regulations, including obtaining consignee authorizations and verifying client identities, led to non-compliance with Courier Import and Export Regulations. Despite financial difficulties, the appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 10,00,00,000 within a specified timeframe to stay recovery proceedings, emphasizing the importance of meeting regulatory obligations and addressing duty demands promptly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:18:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 354 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262437</link>
      <description>The court upheld the demand for customs duty, interest, and penalties amounting to Rs. 27,77,16,984 under the Customs Act, 1962, against the appellant for illegally importing goods under the guise of bonafide gifts. The appellant&#039;s failure to comply with regulations, including obtaining consignee authorizations and verifying client identities, led to non-compliance with Courier Import and Export Regulations. Despite financial difficulties, the appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 10,00,00,000 within a specified timeframe to stay recovery proceedings, emphasizing the importance of meeting regulatory obligations and addressing duty demands promptly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>