https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171911 A detenu's representation must receive meaningful and prompt consideration by every authority competent to revoke detention under Article 22(5), and unreasonable delay or non-consideration by the Central Government infringes that safeguard. The subsequent breach, however, does not render the original detention order under COFEPOSA void ab initio, because that order rests on the detaining authority's satisfaction on the material before it. The legal effect of the infraction is confined to continued detention becoming unlawful, while the initial detention order remains valid. en-us Wed, 14 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171911 A detenu's representation must receive meaningful and prompt consideration by every authority competent to revoke detention under Article 22(5), and unreasonable delay or non-consideration by the Central Government infringes that safeguard. The subsequent breach, however, does not render the original detention order under COFEPOSA void ab initio, because that order rests on the detaining authority's satisfaction on the material before it. The legal effect of the infraction is confined to continued detention becoming unlawful, while the initial detention order remains valid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171911