<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 555 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171902</link>
    <description>The appeal involving less than &amp;amp;8377; 50,000 was admitted by Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI based on substantial legal questions regarding the payment of duty for clearance of inputs/capital goods. The Tribunal concluded that the facility of distinguish payment of duty applies to both inputs and capital goods, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal filed by the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 10:12:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 555 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171902</link>
      <description>The appeal involving less than &amp;amp;8377; 50,000 was admitted by Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI based on substantial legal questions regarding the payment of duty for clearance of inputs/capital goods. The Tribunal concluded that the facility of distinguish payment of duty applies to both inputs and capital goods, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal filed by the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>