<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 353 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262436</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the appellant on various issues related to the classification of incentives, commissions, services, and charges. The Tribunal held that the payments received from Maruti Udyog Limited cannot be classified as Business Auxiliary Services commissions. Specific matters were remanded for further verification and decision by the Adjudicating Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2017 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 353 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262436</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the appellant on various issues related to the classification of incentives, commissions, services, and charges. The Tribunal held that the payments received from Maruti Udyog Limited cannot be classified as Business Auxiliary Services commissions. Specific matters were remanded for further verification and decision by the Adjudicating Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>