<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 351 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262434</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the lower authorities&#039; decision on refund claims for service tax paid before service tax registration was granted to be unsustainable. Citing legal precedents and rules, the Tribunal held that there is no statutory provision mandating registration as a condition for claiming Cenvat credit, leading to the rejection of the refund claim being legally incorrect. The appellants were granted consequential relief based on established judicial pronouncements and interpretations of relevant laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 06:04:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 351 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262434</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the lower authorities&#039; decision on refund claims for service tax paid before service tax registration was granted to be unsustainable. Citing legal precedents and rules, the Tribunal held that there is no statutory provision mandating registration as a condition for claiming Cenvat credit, leading to the rejection of the refund claim being legally incorrect. The appellants were granted consequential relief based on established judicial pronouncements and interpretations of relevant laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>