<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 333 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262416</link>
    <description>The special leave petition was dismissed, but the Court noted that if the property is auctioned or otherwise disposed of by the Income Tax Department, the petitioner may seek participation and any such request should be considered. The operative effect is that the dismissal did not foreclose the petitioner from seeking participation in any future disposal process, leaving that request open for consideration by the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:58:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 333 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262416</link>
      <description>The special leave petition was dismissed, but the Court noted that if the property is auctioned or otherwise disposed of by the Income Tax Department, the petitioner may seek participation and any such request should be considered. The operative effect is that the dismissal did not foreclose the petitioner from seeking participation in any future disposal process, leaving that request open for consideration by the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>