<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 332 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262415</link>
    <description>The court allowed the application for condonation of delay in refiling the appeal. The assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was upheld, with the court finding no infirmity in the Assessing Officer&#039;s actions. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to uphold the assessment order by CIT (Appeals) without independent findings was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed. The addition made under Section 68 based on credits not in the regular books of accounts was upheld, as was the addition based on individual creditor&#039;s peak credit. The court dismissed the appeal challenging additions made on suspicion without corroborative material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:58:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 332 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262415</link>
      <description>The court allowed the application for condonation of delay in refiling the appeal. The assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was upheld, with the court finding no infirmity in the Assessing Officer&#039;s actions. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to uphold the assessment order by CIT (Appeals) without independent findings was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed. The addition made under Section 68 based on credits not in the regular books of accounts was upheld, as was the addition based on individual creditor&#039;s peak credit. The court dismissed the appeal challenging additions made on suspicion without corroborative material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>