<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 326 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262409</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s cross-appeal. The Tribunal upheld the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decisions on rental income, bogus purchases, bogus sales, and the rejection of financial results. It remanded the issues of unexplained cash credit and interest deduction for further verification by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:58:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 326 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262409</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s cross-appeal. The Tribunal upheld the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decisions on rental income, bogus purchases, bogus sales, and the rejection of financial results. It remanded the issues of unexplained cash credit and interest deduction for further verification by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>