<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 325 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262408</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals, deleting the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment years 2005-06 to 2009-10. The Tribunal found that there was insufficient evidence to justify the penalties as there was no conclusive proof of income concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. Additionally, uncertainty regarding the true owner of the unaccounted income and lack of clarity on the penalty provisions led to the deletion of penalties for all appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:58:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 325 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262408</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals, deleting the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment years 2005-06 to 2009-10. The Tribunal found that there was insufficient evidence to justify the penalties as there was no conclusive proof of income concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. Additionally, uncertainty regarding the true owner of the unaccounted income and lack of clarity on the penalty provisions led to the deletion of penalties for all appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>