<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 310 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262393</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. The addition of Rs. 25 lakh under section 56(2)(vi) of the Income Tax Act was in favor of the assessee, as the amount received was returned with profits and did not result in a benefit to the assessee. Regarding the second issue of adding Rs. 45,513 as the estimated ALV of a vacant property, a compromise was reached to reduce the valuation to Rs. 30,000 from the initial amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 310 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262393</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. The addition of Rs. 25 lakh under section 56(2)(vi) of the Income Tax Act was in favor of the assessee, as the amount received was returned with profits and did not result in a benefit to the assessee. Regarding the second issue of adding Rs. 45,513 as the estimated ALV of a vacant property, a compromise was reached to reduce the valuation to Rs. 30,000 from the initial amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>