<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 659 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171901</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the Department&#039;s appeal was covered by the Larger Bench ruling in Dharmendra Textile Processors, which was noted as favouring the Department. Applying that binding precedent, the Court allowed the Civil Appeal. The operative point was that the issue raised by the Department stood resolved by the earlier Larger Bench decision, and the appeal succeeded on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:44:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 659 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171901</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the Department&#039;s appeal was covered by the Larger Bench ruling in Dharmendra Textile Processors, which was noted as favouring the Department. Applying that binding precedent, the Court allowed the Civil Appeal. The operative point was that the issue raised by the Department stood resolved by the earlier Larger Bench decision, and the appeal succeeded on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>