https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171892 The Supreme Court held that the Calcutta High Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain a petition regarding land acquisition in Rajasthan. The notification for land acquisition by the Rajasthan State Government was deemed valid, and the Court criticized the Calcutta High Court for issuing an exparte prohibitory order that halted the acquisition proceedings. The appeal was allowed, the High Court orders were set aside, and proceedings were quashed with costs of Rs. 5,000. en-us Mon, 08 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Jul 2017 11:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171892 The Supreme Court held that the Calcutta High Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain a petition regarding land acquisition in Rajasthan. The notification for land acquisition by the Rajasthan State Government was deemed valid, and the Court criticized the Calcutta High Court for issuing an exparte prohibitory order that halted the acquisition proceedings. The appeal was allowed, the High Court orders were set aside, and proceedings were quashed with costs of Rs. 5,000. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171892