<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 902 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171887</link>
    <description>In motor accident claims, compensation must be assessed as just compensation on the evidence and is not confined to the amount claimed in the petition. The multiplier method is a recognised guide, but the Second Schedule is not rigid, and future prospects, salary benefits and other pecuniary factors may be considered to fix a fair award. A late objection that claimants failed to disclose alleged insurance receipts was rejected because it had not been raised below and was not put to the witnesses. The compensation award was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 08:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 902 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171887</link>
      <description>In motor accident claims, compensation must be assessed as just compensation on the evidence and is not confined to the amount claimed in the petition. The multiplier method is a recognised guide, but the Second Schedule is not rigid, and future prospects, salary benefits and other pecuniary factors may be considered to fix a fair award. A late objection that claimants failed to disclose alleged insurance receipts was rejected because it had not been raised below and was not put to the witnesses. The compensation award was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>