<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 786 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171883</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision denying SSI exemption to a manufacturer of P &amp;amp; P Medicaments for clearing goods under a marketing firm&#039;s brand name, stating that mentioning the firm&#039;s name does not constitute clearing goods under the brand name. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2015 11:14:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 786 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171883</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision denying SSI exemption to a manufacturer of P &amp;amp; P Medicaments for clearing goods under a marketing firm&#039;s brand name, stating that mentioning the firm&#039;s name does not constitute clearing goods under the brand name. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>