https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262388 The appellant filed a refund claim for service tax wrongly assessed on commission from print media under "Advertising Services." The authorities reclassified the services to Business Auxiliary Services, which the appellant did not contest before the Tribunal. Consequently, the appeal lacked merit, and the impugned order was upheld, rejecting the refund claim of 80,123. The case highlights the importance of challenging service classification throughout legal proceedings to protect interests effectively. en-us Tue, 12 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Aug 2015 06:15:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262388 The appellant filed a refund claim for service tax wrongly assessed on commission from print media under "Advertising Services." The authorities reclassified the services to Business Auxiliary Services, which the appellant did not contest before the Tribunal. Consequently, the appeal lacked merit, and the impugned order was upheld, rejecting the refund claim of 80,123. The case highlights the importance of challenging service classification throughout legal proceedings to protect interests effectively. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 12 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262388