<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 300 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262383</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed three writ petitions challenging proceedings by the Commercial Tax Officer, where the petitioner failed to submit written replies to multiple assessment notices despite appearing with original invoices. The Court held that the impugned orders were justified as the petitioner did not fulfill the requirement to respond to the notices. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to challenge the decision before the appellate authority, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2015 06:15:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 300 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262383</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed three writ petitions challenging proceedings by the Commercial Tax Officer, where the petitioner failed to submit written replies to multiple assessment notices despite appearing with original invoices. The Court held that the impugned orders were justified as the petitioner did not fulfill the requirement to respond to the notices. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to challenge the decision before the appellate authority, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>