<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 299 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262382</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the duty demand with interest and penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. The appellant was denied the concessional rate under Notification No. 23/2003-CE as they did not meet the specified conditions for DTA clearance, goods similarity, and positive NFE. The extended limitation period was deemed applicable due to the appellant&#039;s non-disclosure of material facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 299 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262382</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the duty demand with interest and penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. The appellant was denied the concessional rate under Notification No. 23/2003-CE as they did not meet the specified conditions for DTA clearance, goods similarity, and positive NFE. The extended limitation period was deemed applicable due to the appellant&#039;s non-disclosure of material facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>