https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262378 The appeals against the order of CESTAT were dismissed due to non-compliance with Section 35B(2) of The Central Excise Act, 1944. The High Court emphasized the necessity of adhering to this section, stating that failure to comply renders any appeal not instituted in the eyes of the law. The judgment highlights the importance of complying with statutory provisions before initiating appeals against CESTAT orders to ensure the validity and admissibility of appeals. Compliance with legal procedures is crucial, as demonstrated in this case where non-compliance led to the dismissal of the appeals. en-us Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Oct 2015 16:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262378 The appeals against the order of CESTAT were dismissed due to non-compliance with Section 35B(2) of The Central Excise Act, 1944. The High Court emphasized the necessity of adhering to this section, stating that failure to comply renders any appeal not instituted in the eyes of the law. The judgment highlights the importance of complying with statutory provisions before initiating appeals against CESTAT orders to ensure the validity and admissibility of appeals. Compliance with legal procedures is crucial, as demonstrated in this case where non-compliance led to the dismissal of the appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262378