<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 294 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262377</link>
    <description>End-use certificates that clearly established use of the goods as parts, accessories, scientific and technical instruments, and for the specified plant and system satisfied the conditions of Notification No. 10/97-C.E., so the assessee remained entitled to exemption. The remand was confined to verification of those certificates, and the Tribunal did not exceed that scope in accepting them. The High Court held that the Commissioner had to assess the certificates against the notification, and once the certified end use was clear, the exemption could not be denied. No substantial question of law arose, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2015 06:15:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 294 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262377</link>
      <description>End-use certificates that clearly established use of the goods as parts, accessories, scientific and technical instruments, and for the specified plant and system satisfied the conditions of Notification No. 10/97-C.E., so the assessee remained entitled to exemption. The remand was confined to verification of those certificates, and the Tribunal did not exceed that scope in accepting them. The High Court held that the Commissioner had to assess the certificates against the notification, and once the certified end use was clear, the exemption could not be denied. No substantial question of law arose, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>