<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 287 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262370</link>
    <description>A stock broker was found responsible for manipulative trades executed through its branch terminal by an employee who acted as branch in-charge and terminal operator. The trades in an illiquid scrip were identified as synchronized, circular and reversal trades carried out over a long period for connected clients, showing manipulation of volume and price. The exchange rule making a member fully responsible for the acts and omissions of agents and employees prevailed over the general rule limiting employer liability for an employee&#039;s tortious act. The broker&#039;s failure to detect the pattern and the breach of the prescribed code of conduct justified the penalty under the SEBI framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2015 06:13:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 287 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262370</link>
      <description>A stock broker was found responsible for manipulative trades executed through its branch terminal by an employee who acted as branch in-charge and terminal operator. The trades in an illiquid scrip were identified as synchronized, circular and reversal trades carried out over a long period for connected clients, showing manipulation of volume and price. The exchange rule making a member fully responsible for the acts and omissions of agents and employees prevailed over the general rule limiting employer liability for an employee&#039;s tortious act. The broker&#039;s failure to detect the pattern and the breach of the prescribed code of conduct justified the penalty under the SEBI framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>