<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 275 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262358</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for reassessment of income for the assessment year 2007-08, finding the reasons provided by the Assessing Officer specific and relevant. It determined that the second respondent had obtained necessary approval for reassessment proceedings and agreed with the Revenue&#039;s contention of non-disclosure of material facts by the petitioner, justifying reassessment. The court rejected the petitioner&#039;s argument of a mere change of opinion and held the notice was not time-barred, affirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction to reopen the assessment. The writ petition was dismissed, upholding the validity of the reassessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2015 06:12:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 275 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262358</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for reassessment of income for the assessment year 2007-08, finding the reasons provided by the Assessing Officer specific and relevant. It determined that the second respondent had obtained necessary approval for reassessment proceedings and agreed with the Revenue&#039;s contention of non-disclosure of material facts by the petitioner, justifying reassessment. The court rejected the petitioner&#039;s argument of a mere change of opinion and held the notice was not time-barred, affirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction to reopen the assessment. The writ petition was dismissed, upholding the validity of the reassessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>