<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 270 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262353</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the discharge of a mortgage created after acquiring the property does not qualify as an expense incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the transfer under Section 48(1)(i) of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2015 08:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 270 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262353</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the discharge of a mortgage created after acquiring the property does not qualify as an expense incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the transfer under Section 48(1)(i) of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>