<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1017 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171873</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal. The appellant was found not ready for commercial operations within the stipulated timeframe and failed to comply with technical specifications. The recovery of liquidated damages was deemed valid as the appellant unconditionally accepted the Migration Package. Allegations of arbitrary treatment were rejected due to lack of evidence. The computation and limitation of liquidated damages were upheld, and estoppel applied due to the appellant&#039;s acceptance of the Migration Package terms. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 15:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1017 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171873</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal. The appellant was found not ready for commercial operations within the stipulated timeframe and failed to comply with technical specifications. The recovery of liquidated damages was deemed valid as the appellant unconditionally accepted the Migration Package. Allegations of arbitrary treatment were rejected due to lack of evidence. The computation and limitation of liquidated damages were upheld, and estoppel applied due to the appellant&#039;s acceptance of the Migration Package terms. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>