<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (12) TMI 66 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171869</link>
    <description>Cost of positive film prints that are demonstrably short-lived and exhausted within the accounting year may be treated as revenue expenditure and written off where the assessee&#039;s consistent accounting practice fairly reflects true profits; accordingly the full claim for positives on the facts was allowed. Retainer payments to legal advisers are deductible only to the extent they accrued in the accounting year; part of the disputed payment related to prior periods or duplication and was disallowed, with a specified portion allowed as deduction. The proviso to the relevant tax provision was not attracted on these facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (12) TMI 66 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171869</link>
      <description>Cost of positive film prints that are demonstrably short-lived and exhausted within the accounting year may be treated as revenue expenditure and written off where the assessee&#039;s consistent accounting practice fairly reflects true profits; accordingly the full claim for positives on the facts was allowed. Retainer payments to legal advisers are deductible only to the extent they accrued in the accounting year; part of the disputed payment related to prior periods or duplication and was disallowed, with a specified portion allowed as deduction. The proviso to the relevant tax provision was not attracted on these facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>