<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 725 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171867</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside and quashed the orders dated 23rd September, 2008, and 27th November, 2008, issued by the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal failed to consider crucial statements in the application for recalling the original order and did not address important evidence. The High Court directed the Tribunal to conduct a fresh hearing, granting the petitioners a fair opportunity to present their case. The respondents were not required to file counter-affidavits, leading to the allegations in the writ petition being deemed unadmitted. The High Court partially allowed the writ petition without imposing costs on either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2017 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 725 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171867</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside and quashed the orders dated 23rd September, 2008, and 27th November, 2008, issued by the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal failed to consider crucial statements in the application for recalling the original order and did not address important evidence. The High Court directed the Tribunal to conduct a fresh hearing, granting the petitioners a fair opportunity to present their case. The respondents were not required to file counter-affidavits, leading to the allegations in the writ petition being deemed unadmitted. The High Court partially allowed the writ petition without imposing costs on either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>