<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 579 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171866</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court confirmed the High Court&#039;s interpretation of statutory provisions, allowing universities to decide on the absorption of employees in converted constituent colleges. The validity of government orders regarding employee absorption was upheld, emphasizing the State&#039;s obligation to adhere to its decisions. The Enquiry Commission&#039;s findings on appointments and qualifications were accepted, leading to specific criteria for employee absorption. Contempt petitions for non-payment of salaries were dismissed due to appointment validity concerns. Impleadment and intervention applications were rejected, directing universities to finalize employee absorption based on the Commission&#039;s report within four months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 579 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171866</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court confirmed the High Court&#039;s interpretation of statutory provisions, allowing universities to decide on the absorption of employees in converted constituent colleges. The validity of government orders regarding employee absorption was upheld, emphasizing the State&#039;s obligation to adhere to its decisions. The Enquiry Commission&#039;s findings on appointments and qualifications were accepted, leading to specific criteria for employee absorption. Contempt petitions for non-payment of salaries were dismissed due to appointment validity concerns. Impleadment and intervention applications were rejected, directing universities to finalize employee absorption based on the Commission&#039;s report within four months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>