<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 256 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262339</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the Adjudicating authority for a detailed examination of duty payments, penalty amounts, and the imposition of Section 76 penalty in light of the payments made by the appellant. The decision highlighted the importance of proper reconciliation of payment particulars and the need for a comprehensive review of the penalty imposition in accordance with the applicable legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 06:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 256 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262339</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the Adjudicating authority for a detailed examination of duty payments, penalty amounts, and the imposition of Section 76 penalty in light of the payments made by the appellant. The decision highlighted the importance of proper reconciliation of payment particulars and the need for a comprehensive review of the penalty imposition in accordance with the applicable legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>