<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 255 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262338</link>
    <description>The tribunal acknowledged the significant delay in compliance with the pre-deposit order, spanning over 5 years. Despite this, the appellant demonstrated efforts by making payments in installments from 2009 to 2013 due to financial constraints. Considering the appellant&#039;s genuine interest and gradual fulfillment of the pre-deposit requirement, the tribunal decided to condone the delay and restore the appeal to its original status.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 06:40:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 255 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262338</link>
      <description>The tribunal acknowledged the significant delay in compliance with the pre-deposit order, spanning over 5 years. Despite this, the appellant demonstrated efforts by making payments in installments from 2009 to 2013 due to financial constraints. Considering the appellant&#039;s genuine interest and gradual fulfillment of the pre-deposit requirement, the tribunal decided to condone the delay and restore the appeal to its original status.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>