https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262337 The Tribunal considered whether the appellant had shown a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit against service tax demand on transportation of limestone by truck operators from the mining area to the crushing area. It noted that the dispute turned on the nature of the fortnightly billing and the absence of consignment notes, while the appellant had otherwise been paying service tax on GTA services. On the material available at the interim stage, full waiver was not justified. The Tribunal directed a deposit of Rs. 1,00,000 within four weeks and, upon such deposit, waived the balance demand and stayed recovery during the appeal. en-us Tue, 12 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Aug 2015 06:40:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262337 The Tribunal considered whether the appellant had shown a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit against service tax demand on transportation of limestone by truck operators from the mining area to the crushing area. It noted that the dispute turned on the nature of the fortnightly billing and the absence of consignment notes, while the appellant had otherwise been paying service tax on GTA services. On the material available at the interim stage, full waiver was not justified. The Tribunal directed a deposit of Rs. 1,00,000 within four weeks and, upon such deposit, waived the balance demand and stayed recovery during the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 12 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262337