https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262331 The Court quashed the order of the Settlement Commission rejecting the application under section 32-E of the Central Excise Act. It criticized the premature closure of proceedings and emphasized the need for thorough examination and cooperation for settlement. The Court directed the Commission to proceed under section 32-F, ensuring compliance with statutory requirements and keeping contentions open for both parties, promoting expeditious dispute resolution and settlement of claims. The Writ Petition was allowed, setting aside the impugned order and instructing adherence to the statutory process for settlement applications. en-us Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Jan 2016 17:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262331 The Court quashed the order of the Settlement Commission rejecting the application under section 32-E of the Central Excise Act. It criticized the premature closure of proceedings and emphasized the need for thorough examination and cooperation for settlement. The Court directed the Commission to proceed under section 32-F, ensuring compliance with statutory requirements and keeping contentions open for both parties, promoting expeditious dispute resolution and settlement of claims. The Writ Petition was allowed, setting aside the impugned order and instructing adherence to the statutory process for settlement applications. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262331