https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262326 The appellant was held liable to pay Anti-dumping Duty (ADD) at a specified rate, with interest on customs duties deemed not chargeable due to the absence of stipulation in the bond. The court clarified that ADD should not be included in calculating Special Customs Duty (SCD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD). The penalty imposed was overturned based on the appellant's genuine inability to meet export obligations, leading to a successful appeal and the setting aside of the CESTAT judgment. en-us Tue, 04 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262326 The appellant was held liable to pay Anti-dumping Duty (ADD) at a specified rate, with interest on customs duties deemed not chargeable due to the absence of stipulation in the bond. The court clarified that ADD should not be included in calculating Special Customs Duty (SCD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD). The penalty imposed was overturned based on the appellant's genuine inability to meet export obligations, leading to a successful appeal and the setting aside of the CESTAT judgment. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 04 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262326