<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 242 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262325</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the endorsement on the Bill of Entry constituted a notice of demand under Section 95(ii)(b) of the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, making the appellants eligible for the Scheme. The Court emphasized the Scheme&#039;s objective of expeditiously recovering tax arrears. The High Court&#039;s judgment was set aside, and the appellants were granted the benefit of the Scheme. The appeals were allowed with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2015 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 242 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262325</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the endorsement on the Bill of Entry constituted a notice of demand under Section 95(ii)(b) of the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, making the appellants eligible for the Scheme. The Court emphasized the Scheme&#039;s objective of expeditiously recovering tax arrears. The High Court&#039;s judgment was set aside, and the appellants were granted the benefit of the Scheme. The appeals were allowed with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>