<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 232 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262315</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the retrospective nature of the amendment to Section 40(a)(ia) by the Finance Act, 2010, emphasizing its curative purpose and the need to prevent undue hardships on taxpayers. The judgment favored the assessee and ruled against the Revenue, dismissing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 232 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262315</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the retrospective nature of the amendment to Section 40(a)(ia) by the Finance Act, 2010, emphasizing its curative purpose and the need to prevent undue hardships on taxpayers. The judgment favored the assessee and ruled against the Revenue, dismissing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>